Are apprenticeships scalable?
Back at the beginning of the year I had lunch with a university professor interested in the notion of software craftsmanship. This is an extract from an email he sent me at the time:
I wonder about how scalable the apprenticeship model is. It seems to be predicated upon mentorship, where each apprentice has a mentor. This means you need a large number of mentors if you have a large number of apprentices. They will have to be found and paid. This will cause difficulties... If you want 1 teacher per 10 students you'd have to find an pay 10 times as many as now. How does the Software Craftsmanship movement intend to deal with this?
Buried in this problem is an inherent assumption about the way programming is taught. It assumes the current university model of teaching undergraduates: employing researchers who spend most of their time away from their students doing what they’d really like to be doing, whilst having to teach classes to pay the bills.
If you try and use an apprenticeship model in this context, you run into severe funding issues: who will pay for all the extra researchers?
A different way
Why don’t universities do real software projects? Why can’t we have master practitioners being paid by real clients to do real work, and have the students along for a ride, learning as they go?
The funding issues will be cleared up as business will be paying. Students work for free, or perhaps room and board. Either way they won’t be saddled by exhorbitant fees.
If this makes sitting in a lecture hall listening to information difficult to fund, then great. That’s one of the most inefficient ways to learn: why do we persist in trying to sustain it? There is value in book learning, and the industry does currently rely on students to achieve that through university education. But the best way to pick up those principles is through real-world examples on real projects, supported by appropriate exercises designed to drive home specific points. It is certainly not through sitting in a lecture hall.
Maybe this model is a step too far for a traditional university. Perhaps they’re not be the best place to learn our craft. Our current university system is designed to create great professors, not great practitioners. Perhaps it’s time for a change.
More articles
Introducing Kaijo: AI functions that just work
For months, I have wrestled with a problem that has consumed my thoughts and challenged everything I know about software development.
This week I wrote about building the future with AI agents. One of the key areas for me is moving beyond prompt engineering to something more reliable.
I have spent decades learning how to craft reliable software. Now I want to bring that reliability to AI development.
Today I am ready to share what I have been building in the background.
It started with a game. It ended with something that could change how we build AI applications forever.
Read moreBuilding the Future
Something has been on my mind for months. The rapid evolution of AI agents has opened up possibilities I cannot ignore.
We are witnessing the emergence of semi autonomous agents that will fundamentally reshape how we work and communicate. The opportunities in this space are extraordinary. I am diving deeper into this world of AI agent development and product creation.
My newsletter is evolving. Instead of dispensing tips from a position of authority, I invite you on a journey of discovery. I will document my experiences building with AI, how to apply my tech experience in a new world, and navigating the inevitable struggles and setbacks.
Read on for several key areas I am exploring.
Read moreStartup Success Stories Are Flawed
In his book on mapping business strategy, Simon Wardley makes an observation that struck me hard recently.
You cannot learn chess from a list of moves. Even with access to every grandmaster game ever played, simply studying the sequence of moves will not make you a strong player. Without understanding the board position, the strategic context, and the invisible forces at play, these move lists are merely shadows of the actual game.
This observation triggered a thought that has been bothering me about how we approach startup knowledge and learning.
Read moreFounder mode is emergency surgery
“Founder mode” is emergency surgery. It is not the right way to run a healthy business.
If your company is sick, you need to fix it. That means courageous decisions only you can make. You will need to dive in and operate sometimes. That doesn’t mean you create bottlenecks by deciding everything for years to come.
Read moreHow to Build a Robust LLM Application
Last month at Cherrypick we launched a brand new meal generator that uses LLMs to create personalized meal plans.
It has been a great success and we are pleased with the results. Customers are changing their plans 30% less and using their plans in their baskets 14% more.
However, getting to this point was not straightforward, and we learned many things that can go wrong when building these types of systems.
Here is what we learned about building an LLM-based product that actually works, and ends up in production rather than languishing in an investor deck as a cool tech demo.
Read more